Content: Usefulness
of information provided for our community, quality of
writing, currency of information |
0 |
Information is of limited use to community; writing is unclear or full of errors; content lacks
update information |
1 |
Information
is of some use to community; writing is somewhat clear
and correct; update information is included but not current |
2 |
Information is of moderate use to community; writing is competent; update information is included
and fairly current |
3 |
Information is useful to community;
writing is effective; update information is current |
4 |
Information is excellent and complete; writing
is outstanding; updates are ongoing and current |
| Ease of Use: Ease of navigation, accuracy
of links, logical structure |
0 |
Navigation is unwieldy or confusing; many
links are inactive; structure is arbitrary |
1 |
Navigation is somewhat competent; some links are active;
structure is somewhat logical |
2 |
Navigation is mostly competent;
links are mostly active; structure is mostly logical |
3 |
Navigation is competent;
links are active; structure is logical |
4 |
Navigation is intuitive/easy;
all links are active; structure is very logical |
Appearance: Quality
of the graphics, legibility of text, overall layout, color scheme |
0 |
Graphics are too large or too small; text
is illegible; layout is confusing; color scheme is problematic |
1 |
Some Graphics are too large or too small; some text
is illegible; some layout is confusing; some color schemes are problematic |
2 |
Most Graphics are acceptable; Most text is legible;
layout is mostly competent; color scheme is mostly suitable |
3 |
Graphics are acceptable; text is legible;
layout is competent; color scheme is suitable |
4 |
Graphics are exceptional; text is legible;
layout is exceptional; color scheme enhances site |